When disaster strikes or issues arise in a business, those in leadership may feel the need to step in and attempt to solve the problem. They want to be the hero, and as leaders they may be naturally inclined to do so. But is this tendency really helping anyone? Of course leaders have a responsibility to respond to situations, but the onus to take over situations to “fix” them, may be misguided.
Colonel Fred Maddox, an assistant professor at the U.S. Army War College and Chief of Staff of the Army senior fellow at the Kellogg School shares his experiences in a new article from Kellogg Insight blog. In it, he explains that leaders need to resist the urge to ignore their own workload to help resolve these situations. “When leaders act like they’re the only ones who can solve something, it can become an issue for the whole organization,” Maddox says, “because they’re not focused on strategy and they’re doing someone else’s job.” Let that one marinate for a while.
Maddox goes on to tell leaders that when the urge to step in arises, take a step back and reflect on the situation first. Ask why this intervention is necessary. Are there fears around teams or individuals failing? Are there no systems of accountability? Is there just plain fear that the entire ship will go down? Once there is a good understanding of why this urge is coming up, then it can be addressed. Is the team/individual really in danger of failing? Likely not. It’s likely that they are actually quite capable if left to figure things out.
In preparation for problems inevitably arising, some leaders may want to rehearse common issues so that this urge to intervene may be better controlled. The confidence built for teams, individuals, and leaders can go a long way to allow everyone to do their jobs, and keep leadership in the strategic roles where they belong. Check out the article and see if you can let go of some of these tendencies.